Over the last few years, security cameras and other devices have become more common. Some people argue that these measures violate the right to personal privacy. Others argue that they are necessary to reduce crime. What do you think? Why?

Respuesta :

Answer:

I think that privacy is an ever-growing concern for the population as more of our daily lives are documented by cameras. I believe that as long as cameras are not placed in areas without the publics knowledge or consent, then they are fine. Though people think that security cameras violate the right to personal privacy, it's also necessary for them to be set in place. An example would be a robbery, a murder, a hit and run, a shootout, and many more events. I think I am most scared of cameras being hidden in things that aren't supposed to have cameras.

Explanation:

Security cameras can be described by the oxymoron, "necessary evil." This means that they are important devices that can be intrusive at times.

In business environments and homes, security cameras can be used to detect criminal activities and solve criminal cases. However, they can at times invade the privacies of people.

This does not negate the importance of these devices. Security cameras are very important to reduce crime. Policies should be put in place to limit their intrusive scope.

Learn more about security devices here:

https://brainly.com/question/4021912