In November 2005, an international study to assess public opinion on the treatment of suspected terrorists was conducted (“Most in U.S., Britain, S. Korea, and France Say Torture is OK in at Least Rare Instances,” Associated Press, December 7, 2005). Each individual in random samples of 1000 adults from each of 9 different countries was asked the following question: “Do you feel the use of torture against suspected terrorists to obtain information about terrorism activities is justified?” Responses from Italy, Spain, France, the United States, and South Korea are summarized in the table below. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the response proportions are not the same for all five countries? Use a = 0.01 to test the appropriate hypotheses.

Based on the responses, the significance level, and the p-value, we can conclude that the response proportions are not the same for the countries.

What can be concluded about the response proportions for these countries?

The null hypothesis is that the response proportions are the same. The alternate hypothesis is that the response proportions are not the same.

The sample size is large enough for a Chi-Square test to be used because the expected counts are all greater than 5.

Running a Chi-Square analysis shows that the P-value to be 0.000.

The P-Value is less than the significance level of 0.01 so the null hypothesis is rejected. This means that the alternate hypothesis of the response proportions not being the same is true.

Find out more on chi-square tests at https://brainly.com/question/4543358.

#SPJ1