The two cases were on area redestricting and gerrymandering. They are court rulings on districts.
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5–4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.
An act of the Alabama legislature re-drew the electoral district boundaries of Tuskegee, replacing what had been a region with a square shape with a twenty-eight sided figure. The effect of the new district was to exclude essentially all blacks from the city limits of Tuskegee and place them in a district where no whites lived.
Therefore, similarities and differences are as stated above.
learn more about shaw v. reno and gomillion v. lightfoot from here: https://brainly.com/question/1278532
