Respuesta :
Answer:
The ratios of earnings to hours are not the same each week, so the earnings do not vary directly with the hours.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that the data points given by (x,y) are in direct variation if:
[tex]\dfrac{y}{x}=k[/tex] for each (x,y)
We are given data as:
Caleb’s Earnings Hours(x) 12 15 18 21
Earnings (in dollars)(y) 140 170 200 230
So, we could see the ratio as:
- [tex]\dfrac{140}{12}=\dfrac{35}{3}[/tex]
- [tex]\dfrac{170}{15}=\dfrac{34}{3}[/tex]
- [tex]\dfrac{200}{18}=\dfrac{100}{9}[/tex]
- [tex]\dfrac{230}{21}[/tex]
Hence, we could see that each ratio are not equal.
Hence, the relationship between the earnings and the number of hours does not represents a direct variation.
Answer:
B)The ratios of earnings to hours are not the same each week, so the earnings do not vary directly with the hours.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following information in the question:
Caleb’s Earnings Hours: 12 15 18 21
Earnings (in dollars): 140 170 200 230
The equation of line is given by:
[tex](y-y_1) = \displaystyle\frac{y_2-y_2}{x_2-x_1}(x-x_1)[/tex]
where, [tex](x_1,y_1), (x_2.y_2)[/tex] is the point through which the line passes.
The equation of line is:
[tex](y-140) = \displaystyle\frac{170 - 140}{15-12}(x-12)\\\\(y-140)= 10(x-12)\\y = 10x - 120 + 140\\y = 10x + 20[/tex]
Since we did not obtain the equation of the form y = kx where k is a constant, thus relationship between the earnings and the number of hours represents is not a direct variation.
[tex]\displaystyle\frac{140}{12} \neq \frac{170}{15} \neq \frac{200}{18} \neq \frac{230}{21}[/tex]
B)The ratios of earnings to hours are not the same each week, so the earnings do not vary directly with the hours.