In the Ann Hopkins v. Price-Waterhouse case, what was the outcome?
1) Hopkins was disciplined for wearing clothes that were too feminine and too much make-up in an accounting firm.
2) Hopkins was promoted, but sued when she was given a lower salary increase than her male counterparts.
3) The U.S. Supreme Court clarified the illegality of using compliance with gender roles in job decisions.
4) Hopkins was not promoted because she billed fewer hours (e.g., earned less revenue) than her male counterparts.
5) None of the above.