Sarah, an employee of Amex Corporation, committed a serious criminal act in an attempt to obtain a large sales order for her employer. A court found her guilty of the felony and also found the corporation guilty of criminal conduct. The company was fined $1 million. The court
a) erred in fining the company because finding both Sarah and the corporation guilty violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution.
b) acted properly if this were a federal proceeding; however, it did not act properly if this were a state proceeding.
c) acted properly in finding Sarah guilty; however, it erred in finding the corporation guilty because of the exclusionary rule.
d) acted properly in this case.